Thanks for your detailed and thoughtful reply. Yes, I must accept the fact that there are "features" and then there are "quality features." A camera I have has autofocus as a feature. But that feature on my camera falls far short of that same feature on cameras costing 3 times as much, sometimes causing that feature to be virtually useless.
In reviews and opinions of keyboards, it would be instructive to see a listing of 10 or 20 common features, for example key-bed quality, quality of specific voices (piano, organ, choir, trumpet, flute, etc.), recording quality, rhythm quality, accompaniment quality, sequencer quality, etc along with ease of use ratings of each feature. Having a "feature" is one thing; having "useful" or flawless features is quite another. Feature evaluation could include categories of performance, such as: useless/flawed/gimmicky; useful but with imperfect implementation; pro quality. The recording quality on the 7500 I assume would fall in the "useful with imperfect implementation" category indicating it falls short of "pro quality" for various reasons: noise, distortion, level, frequency response, etc. (Wouldn't it be a blast to be given a $20,000 budget by Consumer Reports and be the chief reviewer for 50 different keyboards.) Another way to express an evaluation would be the performance of a feature relative to both 1) other devices in its general price range AND 2) devices double the price. I'm guessing the 3500 has features that are mostly equal to performance of other units in its price range. Some of the features may be inferior, some superior. A couple may even rival that feature in top boards.
With all that said in relation to the mike input noise, I understand there are keyboards at HALF the price of the 7500 that have a mike input. They tend to have a Karaoke-type feature. Not many or any in the price range of the 7500 that I am aware of have a mike-in. I wonder how clean or distorted the mike inputs are on these cheaper devices. So, if I'm wanting to record my miked acoustic instrument along with a rhythm track, how obtrusive will this noise be? You indicated that the casual user may not notice or be bothered by the level of noise produced. I know what a bad capacitor sounds like on an audio device - it is a low level background random static which I find distracting and unacceptable. Is this mike input noise that bad? Is it continuous, or is it a microsecond blip when the gate open/closes with changes in input? Could you guess a S/N ratio? Does it consume1% 5% 10% or 50% of the signal capacity?