I thought about that, but I can't think of anything else that comes close to fitting. There are at least a couple of accidentals used, if that's relevant. Maybe they're scale degrees for a mode that begins with G but uses the notes of the C Major scale? The best thing to do would be look in the book to see what the publisher says.Except that this can't relate to the G Major scale Michael - otherwise the 7th degree would be F#.
I think this is ultimately where our curiosity will be satisfied.The best thing to do would be look in the book to see what the publisher says
Michael I was thinking very similarly to you when I read the score. It would be helpful to see more of the melody too, but at first glance it does not really look like a G mixolydian melody to me in the way it is structured - although yes technically speaking those numbers would relate to a G mixolydian mode.Since the key signature has 0 sharps and 0 flats, the song is ostensibly in the key of C Major. But then the first chord of the song is G7, and those potential scale degrees correspond to a G Major scale with the exception of the 7th being flatted or diminished-- as befits a G7 chord. So would it be possible to say that the song is in the Mixolydian mode of G? I don't know the accepted practices regarding modes as far as things like key signatures. I mean, we can refer to a song that has 0 sharps and 0 flats as being in the key of A Minor rather than C Major, so can that sort of practice be extended to the modes?
Yes this is correct.I still say that 1 = G below Middle C, with the other numbers following suit.
Yes . . my mistake . . G# not F#I notice that at least one number has a plus after it-- 8+, to be exact-- and the note it goes with is the G# above Middle C,
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.