Polyphony is something that puzzles me. I originally had a used Roland RS50. It had 64 note polyphony--but no recorder. I don't think there was a way to play along with yourself at all. So what was the point of all that polyphony?
I sure wish I had that on my MM6, which has an 8 track sequencer--and 34 note polyphony.
Not that I even really need that, as long as I have Cubase.
Actually sounds are made both by hardware and software...
Modern workstations have sound samples stored in ROM memory. .
So the sound samples on their own are made by pure software, but
you need the correct hardware to reproduce them
Sigh... I can only aspire to the day I'm advanced enough to need that kind of polyphony!!If you have an arranger it is good to have plenty of polyphony because
every style will take 8-16 notes
If you turn the sustain and play further... it's not a big problem to go over 100
Yep, I've noticed that. Oh well I guess you can't have everything unless you spend $1000, I should only get good enough to outgrow the mm6 somedayIf you have 32 polyphony (MM6) you'll hear some notes "drop" or disappear. That's because the keyboard ran out of polyphony and the sound processor stopped reproducing the sound of that "previous" note so it can reproduce the sound of the new one you just pressed.
So if you opened up a keyboard you'd see something that looks like computer circuitry & a computer soundcard?
What does the hardware look like that reproduces sound? (I'm visualizing big metal reeds like harmonicas.)
Sigh... I can only aspire to the day I'm advanced enough to need that kind of polyphony!!
Still, the RS50 wasn't an arranger, sequencer or workstation... all it had was the main track, so 64 notes was a bit more than it needed.
Yep, I've noticed that. Oh well I guess you can't have everything unless you spend $1000, I should only get good enough to outgrow the mm6 someday
If you can carry a tune you are on a good way to
be a keyboard player . Learn some theory (how the chords and the notes
relate to each other, and practice, practice, practice...
I have been doing some of my practice on our old clavinova which has hard action just like a real piano. I think it's a good idea to get my hands used to "the real thing". I think it would condition/strengthen my hands. It would be embarassing if I only learned on the 'plasticky thing' and then tried to play a piano someday and couldn't.My advice is NOT to try semi-pro and pro keyboards cause, once you get used to semi-weighted keys,
or full-weighted keys you'll ask yourself "How in the world could I play on that plasticky thingy"
You can press them real slow and soft so you get that natural nice and worm
piano sound
So for someone who isn't starting out as a piano player, which is better? Which is better for prog and ambient?
The "sounds" your trying to emulate is a big thing to look for......i have some sounds that trigger on the down stroke of a key and then trigger again on the up stroke....weighted keys are not good for that espacially if your wanting the sound to keep the "tempo" such as a horn hit. Also when using pitch bend, the timing involved when the bend should occur is best achieved with semi weighted or an "organ like keybed"
But, its hard to emmulate a piano strike without weighted keys..expression of the song your playing and key velocity go hand in hand.....weighted keys are much better if playing a piano sound and the song your playing is slow or classical like
So maybe that's why musicians sometimes have TWO keyboards on stage?
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.